Creating a world with only one world view is a priority for some.
So after 6 years of revision ,in 2015 , a 25 year old test was given by an organization that deals with half of the medical schools in the country.
Other than the test was longer and alledgedly bias in some form towards finding out some attributes new doctors may have.
Since medical school is 4 years in duration followed by many years of further training /schooling the author provides nohing to be concerened about
as for results.
Given the results of the new test will not be known for at least 8 years or more following med. school one can stay with their exsisting doctors
without to much concern. Even if they are ( fill in blank) .
Myself , if I want to know, first I read the diploma on wall and research from there.
The if I care is predicated by if I care !
God I hope you don't pay for this stuff.
Good. So when the test asks questions to eliminate leftist thinking, that will be OK. Right?
Anything on such a test that does not relate to the discipline itself is inappropriate.
Not yet, to be determined.
Sorry your a better thinker than I am,in the seven minute read (as noted on article )you could determine this
when no absolutely ,no evidence was presented to suggest anything left or right . Matter of fact there is nothing given except an opinion
about the test and its' revision. Is the other 50% of schools doing using another test methodology ?
Is the issue I don't buy it and see the possible falacy of this article and the lack of specifics in it..
I know it is on the internet so must be true.
Rubbish. When the bias is the same as yours, you don't see it?
"One MCAT practice question (from a collaboration between the AAMC and online-education nonprofit Khan Academy), for example, asks whether the wage gap between men and women is the result of bigotry, sexism, racism, or biological differences (no other options are provided, and the "correct" answer is sexism)."
Yes, yes, I am going to my doctor ASAP and ask that question and evaluate answer
to the question. I am sure she will tell me to take my medication and move on .
No bias except the article basically sucks IMO due to its' lacking enough to raise anyones' blood pressure.
What does the author offer for a remedy to this egregious assault on humanity ?
Should applicants be tattoed if they took and passed test.
I can infer that a African American med. school applicant who answers and thinks "the honkey mother f----- is racist", would fail the question .
Ask yourself if the residents of Wytopitlock , Maine, at coffee this morning were asked about this ,how would they react to this egregious issue ?
They wouldn't except to say. Holy shit we have a doctor in town !
So this is why people accept tyrants: the trains run on time. Great. You've got a doctor in town. He's not competent, but he's PC.
Go ahead, your about there to mention the Nazis !
I neither agree with or against the issue. It sucks and is devoid of any substance IMO,that leads me to make choice on it.
When you can provide me with medical graduates that have been thru this and you can know their proclivities and how they feel about war, racism and the destruction of biosphere ,I will make a choice.
So that is how I feel about the article . As for tyrants they combine all forms and kinds.
Instead stop feeding the Smegma brothers , you make it to easy for them.
You are correct, Brucie. It's the batshit crazy stuff that keeps me coming back! Stoolie provides great troll bait.
Once again ,there is no response from me.
A thank you is offered though.