Equal under the Law... or not

11 posts / 0 new
Last post
Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
Equal under the Law... or not

The stakes are high, and only some want justice... other want "just us".

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456354/fisa-scandal-clinton-obama-...

pmconusa
Offline
Last seen: 11 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 04/20/2000 - 12:01am
This perfidy will continue

This perfidy will continue not because what they are doing is against the law, but because they go unpunished. Nearly every single full time politician is guilty because you cannot amass wealth solely on the salary paid. Some do but then it isn't much and anyone who amasses the wealth of our Senators and Representatives both State and federal have gone unpunished and the methods they used or have been enabled to take advantage of by lobbyists have become ingenious. Take Hillary's investment in cattle futures. Angus King did it in investments in green energy. How many politicians got rich on Enron stock? A company that was funded with taxpayer money.

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
You can't get rich in

You can't get rich in politics unless you're a crook. - Harry S. Truman

https://www.allenwest.com/2016/11/25/yikes-something-strange-happens-dem...

There is no other explanation.

KennyRoberts
Offline
Last seen: 4 days 22 hours ago
Joined: 01/18/2005 - 1:01am
unless every person is equal

unless every person is equal under the law, subject to the same prohibitions and penalties, the system is broken and anarchy is the result.

Melvin Udall
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 10 min ago
Joined: 05/01/2002 - 12:01am
"some are more equal than

"some are more equal than others"

Bruce Libby
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 47 min ago
Joined: 01/17/2006 - 7:08pm
If two persons violate the

If two persons violate the same prohibition but receive different penalties ,is the system broken ?

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
That depends on WHY they

That depends on WHY they received different penalties. Police, Prosecutors, and Judges do have some discretion. They can be lenient if they see a reason to do so. But if the reason they do so has anything to do with prejudice (in any direction, not just towards minority), improper influence, or financial incentive, then it is massive injustice - and a crime in its own right.

The Clintons are getting a pass in the current debacles, and they should NOT. They're guilty of exactly the same things that others are, and in many cases to a far worse degree. You name it: influence peddling, pay-for-play, collusion, sexual misconduct, and possibly worse forms of corruption. It really annoys me to hear anyone claim that either Clinton is any better suited to the big chair than its current resident, or any of the prior occupants or candidates. These two Clintons are the WORST EVER.

pmconusa
Offline
Last seen: 11 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 04/20/2000 - 12:01am
There is but one law

There is but one law necessary for a society whose survival is assured by abundance and sharing of natures bounty and that is thou shalt not steal. This law and the punishments for it were laid down in the book of Leviticus. I urge you to read the English translation from the original Hebrew because every translation from other sources has contained modifications that either exempt certain classes of people from it or do not mandate the death penalty for its violation.

As Mel so correctly points out, George Orwell adequately demonstrated in his book Animal Farm that all animals are equal but, some animals are more equal than others and those are the ones we elect to public office and allow them to control who gets how much of what through the tax code.

Toolsmith
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 07/14/2016 - 11:22am
That's the strangest

That's the strangest interpretation of Animal Farm I've ever read. I do not believe Orwell was suggesting that holding some as "more equal" was, in any way, a good idea. Most interpretations read it as a criticism of the communist system as well.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that the revisionists have reinterpreted this too.

pmconusa
Offline
Last seen: 11 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 04/20/2000 - 12:01am
Who said it was a good idea.

Who said it was a good idea. Since it turns out I am right it wasn't.

taxfoe
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 03/22/2000 - 1:01am
From the link in Toolsmith's

From the link in Toolsmith's OP:

What is needed?

Attorney General Sessions must find muscular, ambitious, and combative prosecutors (preferably from outside Washington, D.C., and preferably existing federal attorneys), direct them to call a Grand Jury, and begin collating information from congressional investigations to get to the bottom of what is likely one of gravest scandals in post-war American history: the effort to use the federal government to thwart the candidacy of an unpopular presidential candidate and then to smear and ruin his early tenure as president.
______________________________________________________________

Remember how easy it was to follow the O.J. trial? That it was the worlds first 24/7, made for TV, criminal trial probably helped. But I wonder if the fact that nearly everyone 'knew' he was guilty and were merely waiting for the pieces to fall into place made it seem easy.

This one isn't going to be so easy. Joseph diGenova has ben getting a lot of airtime down in deplorable media. This VIDEO interview with him will help to guide you through the web of scandals we're dealing with. The SECOND LINK is to a 2013 (not colored by current events), somewhat autobiographical interview he gave. I include it (he doesn't WIKI) so you can see that he's not a piker.

I admit that, as this unravels, I'm going to need some help with the play by play and Joe sounds like a good candidate for the job.

The Obama Administration's 'Brazen Plot To Exonerate Hillary Clinton' Starting To Seep Out

YOUTUBE 31:19

A Conversation With Joseph diGenova

SOURCE

Log in to post comments