"Just to make it clear, my minor error does not automatically make the rest of my argument false as you would like to intimate."
Well, maybe not; but it certainly calls into question your mastery of the underlying details upon which you base your constant replays. If you can't handle the basics, why should we believe you can handle the existential?
Not to mention that your simple admission was followed by paragraphs of bloviation to dismiss it from the reader's consciousness as a rare gem.
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell
Nice try. If my position on the subject is so wrong, why don't you defend yours. You won't even tell us what it is so we can debate the issue. Debating with you is like arguing with a deaf mute.
My position on what? Your statements that we're screwed, and politicians are crooks? And that we have too many people?
At the moment, my position is sitting. But it will change momentarily.
2 + 2 = 4.
I'll wait for your response, and your position on this.